deviant art

Deviant Login Shop  Join deviantART for FREE Take the Tour
[x]
Shop Similar Prints
This Print Not Available
more ▶

More from ~Gunsmithcat

Featured in Groups:

Details

September 20, 2012
77.3 KB
571×784
Sta.sh
Link
Thumb

Statistics

Comments: 193
Favourites: 485 [who?]

Views: 12,470 (4 today)
Downloads: 164 (0 today)

Camera Data

[x]
Mature Content Filter is On
(Contains: nudity)
:icongunsmithcat:
Hello, my name is Vagina.
This drawing is dedicated for the people who censure the sexuality in art. To the rules created by the admins in deviantART. People who don't have problems to show or watch any kind of violence and are afraid to see a pussy.
Genitals are not monsters, an erected penis or an open vagina are not mutations, are not monsters and are not pornography as the rules here say. Are just anatomy, parts of the human body.
Add a Comment:
 
love 5 5 joy 6 6 wow 0 0 mad 0 0 sad 0 0 fear 0 0 neutral 1 1
:iconsagittarius-a-star:
Haha, nice drawing. :) I agree with you, many people get ridiculously prudish about any depiction of human sexuality while they apparently don't have any problem with people getting torn apart or shot to pieces. D:

This is a dangerous trend, in my opinion. Remember George Orwell's 1984? The Party sought to "educate" its populace to take no pleasure in sex through the Anti-Sex League, conducted experiments on females to find a way to literally nullify their ability to feel, and encouraged hate and fear over any of the finer emotions of love and trust. For the state to maintain control, they sought to crush the human spirit and reduce their population to unthinking, unfeeling cubical drones. A work of science fiction, yes. But, how much different is it really if we see nothing wrong with graphic violence in media, but a woman's vulva is seen as something dirty and shameful and subjected to censorship? Censorship of expression is ultimately about people control, and if someone wants me to accept that watching someone's head blown off with a shotgun is somehow more appropriate for our viewing than an erotic situation between lovers, I'm sorry, I just can't trust that person.

I believe that showing any kind of violence while censoring anyone who dares draw a pussy is a dehumanizing factor that leads people to both feel insecure in their own skins while conditioning them to accept violence as something normal. That just isn't a positive trend in modern society.
Reply
:icongunsmithcat:
yes, is very similar with 1984 in the idea, we have inside of us the idea that sex is something dark and dirty and we accept violence as a natural human reaction. Maybe is gonna change in the future, but I'm not sure. It's hard to change years and years of evolution controlled by the religious morality
Reply
:iconbansheguy:
~Bansheguy Mar 25, 2013  New member
I am of two minds on this. On the one hand, I as a writer and artist, I hate any kind of censorship, or control of expression. But on the other, I can understand DA's position too. They have to deal with much more conservative people OUTSIDE of DA, and all their crazy laws, and unpredictable public opinions. I have also seen what happened to some good sites, when graphic sex was allowed to be posted there. I would hate to see DA go down in a sea of smut like that.

My ex-wife seems to be a good representation of the problem. I was a nudist, and she was not. I was against kids being exposed to blood, violence, and gore, but she was ok with that stuff. When we had a child, arguments started. As usual in today's society, the man lost. We got divorced, and she got custody. So at the age of 5, our daughter was not allowed to ever be undressed, or to see anyone but her mother nude, but it was perfectly ok for her to watch graphically violent and gory R-rated movies. And when I said anything to court officials, they looked at me like _I_ was the sicko!

I don't like the limits DA imposes, but I only see them as a symptom of a much larger problem.

The closest thing to a quick fix that I can see, would be for DA to open a sister site, where sexual stuff would be permitted. That way, if that site is attacked by a mob of prudes, at least this site would remain standing. The only other solution I can see, would be to keep chipping away at American thinking, to reverse how it thinks now. Maybe in a hundred more years we will get to where a lot of European nations got to more than 50 years ago. That, or we all pack up, lock, stock, and barrel, and move to some country like Sweden.
Reply
:icongunsmithcat:
I know they must have a control about that or this site is going to be worst full of sex without any artistic sense. But the rules are so hard and ridiculous here about sex and much free about violence. This website is about art and they are telling people that sexuality is something dangerous and wrong and opposite of art, and violence is something natural and i think this is a mistake. They have to control the website but in my opinion they are doing in the wrong way
Reply
:iconksikevinsi:
Muy buena ilustracion y sobre todo me ha parecido muy bien la explicacion. Como bien dices, los genitales femeninos o masculinos no son una mutacion ni mucho menos. Pero siempre nos econtramos con gente cerrada que aun viendo que "Mature Content" esta activo, siguen en su lucha contra la libertad de expresion.

Como dije antes, muy buena ilustracion, sigue asi tu trabajo es impresionante!

Un saludo desde Asturias!
Reply
:icongunsmithcat:
muchas gracias!
Es algo cultural que difícilmente desaparecerá. Son demasiados años a las espaldas de cultura religiosa represora. Pero tampoco por eso vamos a dejar de intentar cambiar esa idea :)
Reply
:iconksikevinsi:
Ciertamente, pero poco a poco lo vamos consiguiendo. Y poco a poco esa idea de represion va teniendo menos peso. Años atras la cosa estaba mucho mas dificil en cuanto a libertad de expresion. Pero como digo, poco a poco lo conseguiremos jajaj.

Un saludo!
Reply
:icongunsmithcat:
espero que tengas razón :) un saludo!
Reply
Add a Comment: